Detailed paper information

Back to list

Paper title Bi-weekly Voice and text messaging to Improve Pregnancy experience in Rural Andean Peru : A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial using Mixed Methods
Paper code P126
Authors
  1. Matias Finat Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Speaker
  2. Stella Maria Hartinger Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
  3. Daniel Mäusezahl Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Form of presentation Poster
Topics
  • SSTMP
Abstract text Aims: We evaluate the potential effects voice and text messaging, on the improvement of pregnancy experience of pregnant women and young mothers in rural Andean Peru. Expected outcomes of this system-wide m-Health intervention are: maternal attitudinal change toward a positive/improved view on maternal and child health care provision, improved health literacy, health seeking behaviour and practices. We also explore the technical feasibility and participant’s satisfaction of the m-Health intervention in the local population.
Methods: Focus groups were organised to identify format and content of the intervention. 75 participants (37 pregnant women and 38 mothers of a child under 100 days old) were recruited from the San Marcos Province, Cajamarca, Peru and randomly allocated to intervention (n=40) and control groups (n=35). In-depth interviews were carried before the start intervention to: identify the most important determinants of a positive pregnancy and child care experience. A questionnaire enquired about the effects of the intervention on the most important determinants of pregnancy and child-care experiences and collect feedback on the intervention.
Results: Preliminary results show that determinants of a positive pregnancy experience are, among others: Kind treatment by the Health provider, which also impacts trusts, positive perception of medication, supplementation and vaccination given by the Health centre. A majority of intervention recipients (32/40) reported having used the content of the messages. Voice messaging was a main source of information on alarming signs, i.e. symptoms in the mother and the child indicating the need to seek help, for a quarter of them (10/40). Mothers whose husband also received text messages (9/25) reported improved supportive behaviour and attitudinal change towards the new family situation. Text messages are less prone to transmission error than voice messages (0.8% vs 19.9%), mothers preferred voice messaging while pregnant women preferred text messages.
Conclusion: Voice and text messaging is a well-received m-Health intervention that appears feasible to be implemented system-wide in remote high-altitude populations. This current analysis indicates highest value in information transfer to recipients. Analysis of the m-health intervention impact on pre- and postnatal care seeking will be presented.